Friday, July 31, 2015

Taipei tells police to take ‘soft stance’ on students

Taipei tells police to take ‘soft stance’ on students

By Alison Hsiao  /  Staff reporter

Police warn protesters not to break the law as they break through the barricades in front of the Ministry of Education building yesterday.

Photo: Fang Pin-chao, Taipei Times

The Taipei City Government has directed police to take a “soft stance” when facing protesting students, who vaulted the barricades set up around the Ministry of Education early yesterday morning, resulting in a standoff between police stationed around the main building and the protesting students, who have been occupying the ministry’s plaza.
At press time last night, the sit-in was ongoing. Their bringing down the barbed barricade was “monitored” closely, but not stopped by police officers from Zhongzheng First Precinct at about 1:30am yesterday.
That the restrained attitude was taken due to the city government’s orders was confirmed by Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) yesterday, who said the city government directed the police to take “a soft approach,” as both the police and the students are human beings who were not able to sleep the night before and the real problem should be solved by the ministry.
The police were seen guarding the entrances to the ministry’s main building and holding up a banner that said the protesters’ actions have breached the law at least four times throughout the night, but they did not evict or arrest the students.
Another new measure taken by the city government was the deployment of “media liaison” officers.
At least three people wearing pink and partly fluorescent vests with “media liaison of the Taipei City Government Police Department” imprinted on them were seen yesterday outside the ministry building.
The move was taken by the city government after the arrests of three reporters and dozens of students on Thursday night last week and Ko’s subsequent apology for police failing to follow “standard operating procedures.”
One of the officers said that deploying media liaison officers to large gatherings that are prone to violations of the law is not new, but the officers were not as easily identified before.
When questioned by reporters about the deployment, the number of police officers present and whether the students would be evicted, the officers were unable to provide answers.

Taiwan Court throws out appeal to halt curriculum changes

Court throws out appeal to halt curriculum changes

By Alison Hsiao and Loa Iok-sin  /  Staff reporters

Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng, center, yesterday says he will convene a preliminary meeting before he can conduct an impromptu meeting to address controversial adjustments to the high-school curriculum guidelines.

Photo: Chang Chia-ming, Taipei Times

The High Administrative Court yesterday rejected an appeal for an injunction to prevent the Ministry of Education from going ahead with its adjustments to high-school curriculum guidelines that are set to take effect today.
The court said that the complaints cited in the appeal should be dealt with in accordance with the ministry’s regulations, instead of in court.
A lawyer, surnamed Chen (陳), whose son is a senior-high school student, filed the legal challenge to block the ministry from proceeding with the transition to new textbooks under the guidelines.
Saying he does not accept the court’s legal interpretation, Chen vowed to file an appeal.
Separately, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) yesterday called on the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to accept its proposal to hold an extraordinary legislative session to discuss the issue.
“We submitted the petition for an extraordinary session to the Legislative Yuan’s administrative office at 10am, and I would urge Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) to immediately call a cross-party negotiation and an extraordinary session,” DPP caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) said. “The KMT should not try to block the proposal.”
The caucus also demanded that Minister of Education Wu Se-hua (吳思華) step down.
DPP Secretary-General Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) said that different political parties should work together to solve the problem for students.
“I would also like to take this opportunity to tell these young students that you are the future of the nation, so please stay calm, cherish your lives and stay safe,” he said. “We do not want to see a society polarized by these controversies; instead, we should face them together and solve them together. I believe that is what most people would want to see.”
In response to the DPP’s call, which also has the support of the Taiwan Solidarity Union, KMT caucus deputy whip Liao Kuo-tung (廖國棟) said that the curriculum controversy should not be the only issue on the agenda if the legislature is to hold a special session.
Quoting KMT caucus whip Lai Shih-bao (賴士葆), Liao said the KMT caucus is not against calling such a session, but other issues, such as organizational restructuring, a bill on establishing an all-volunteer military and revisions to the restrictions on the duration of stay for foreign workers, should also be discussed.
The KMT caucus would agree to call an extraordinary session only if the three bills are also included, Liao added.
He also questioned the DPP’s motive, saying the DPP’s aim is to respond to and manipulate students, as curriculum issues are under the executive branch’s jurisdiction and should be handled by the education ministry.
The parties did hold a cross-caucus negotiation yesterday afternoon, but only agreed on a resolution to hold talks on Tuesday to decide whether an extraordinary session should be called.
Wang said during the meeting — which Minister Wu also attended — that the executive branch was asked to consider the possibility of temporarily suspending the implementation of the new curriculum guidelines.
According to DPP Legislator Lin Shu-fen (林淑芬), KMT lawmakers, Wu Se-hwa and Executive Yuan Secretary-General Chien Tai-lang (簡太郎) insisted during the negotiations that since the curriculum guidelines had been passed and textbooks had already been chosen, the rollout could not be halted.
Lai said after the meeting that the KMT caucus does not have the right to decide whether Wu Se-hwa should stay on as minister and that there would be no need to call an extraordinary session if the ministry and lawmakers could reach a consensus on the curriculum issue.
If not, the KMT caucus meeting, scheduled for Monday, would decide whether the party should agree to call an extraordinary session, he added.
Additional reporting by Jason Pan and CNA

In Taiwan, Wu, students end talks on sour note

Wu, students end talks on sour note

‘WU, GO TO HELL’:Officials initially told protesters Wu did not have time to meet them. When he did appear, he would not say if he would withdraw the guidelines

By Abraham Gerber  /  Staff reporter

A student leader, front center, declares the breakdown of negotiations with Minister of Education Wu Se-hwa, center back, yesterday in Taipei.

Photo: CNA

Talks between student activists and Minister of Education Wu Se-hwa (吳思華) broke down yesterday, after Wu refused to agree to withdraw controversial adjustments to high-school curriculum guidelines and step down.
“We never would have guessed that there would be a minister of education who cannot even answer an elementary true-or-false question,” student leader Liao Chung-lun (廖崇倫) of Taichung First Senior High School said. “He isn’t able to tell us whether curriculum guidelines will be withdrawn — he is only able to thank us for our opinions, a phrase we are fed up with hearing.”
The “fine-tuned” guidelines’ allegedly “China-centric” focus has sparked waves of student protests.
Wu appeared at the Ministry of Education building’s entrance early in the afternoon, advancing through ranks of police officers. He called for a moment of silence for student activist Dai Lin (林冠華) before falling back behind police officers to address the crowd gathered in the ministry’s outer courtyard.
Lin’s suicide on Thursday was the catalyst behind the latest wave of protests, which led to the courtyard’s occupation during the middle of the following night.
Wu yesterday said that drafting curriculum guidelines was a question that required “expertise,” urging students to hold further talks with the ministry.
“Curriculum guidelines are the future of students and young people — let us do something that we will not regret in 20 years,” he said, adding that only through dialogue could societal “harmony” and “peace” be achieved.
Wu’s comments were repeatedly interrupted with shouts of “withdraw or not,” with members of the crowd raising fists and fingers at Wu, demanding that he limit his remarks to the question of whether the curriculum guidelines would be withdrawn.
“Many societal questions cannot be answered with just checks-and-crosses,” Wu said. “Curriculum guidelines are one of those questions that are not black-and-white.”
Liao declared that negotiations had broken down because Wu had failed to agree to withdraw the guidelines, with the crowd erupting in chants for the minister to “leave” and “resign.”
Yesterday’s confrontation represented the first formal discussions between Wu and the student activists since a ministry-sponsored forum last month.
Activists’ confrontation of Wu during a forum on the guidelines led to the delay of further forums until the past two weeks, while ministry officials insisted that Wu would meet only with student representatives.
Deputy Minister of Education Lucia Lin (林思伶) and Ministry of Education Secretary-General Wang Chun-chuan (王俊權) had addressed students in the morning prior to Wu’s afternoon appearance, telling students to select representatives to meet with ministry officials to set up a later meeting with Wu, whose schedule they said prevented him from addressing the students.
They were quickly shouted down by the crowd, who demanded that Wu “come out and face the music,” rejecting the ministry’s offer of a private meeting as “a pat on the head.”
Yesterday’s confrontation came after student activists occupied the outer courtyard of the ministry early in the morning, after Wu failed to resign following Lin’s suicide.
A student-led crowd pushed down the iron barricades around the ministry, using quilts and cardboard boxes to cover the razor wire and climb into the complex.
As activists streamed into the ministry’s outer courtyard, the police retreated to protect the entrance to the building.
“Now the minister does not have to work so hard and cast lots before being able to meet with students — the people have come looking for the minister,” Restoration of Taiwan Social Justice convener Lin Yu-lun (林于倫) said.
After Lin’s suicide on Thursday, a crowd of about 100 protesters gathered outside the ministry gates, lighting candles and pasting posters on the barricades wishing Wu “sweet dreams.”
At about 10 pm, the crowd suddenly charged to the nearby Legislative Yuan building next door, with some members briefly occupying its courtyard. Students from the Northern Taiwan Anti-Curriculum Changes Alliances were first observed blocking the courtyard entrance, quickly directing the crowd back to the Ministry Education building after police reinforcements arrived.
Yang Shang-en (楊尚恩) of the activist group Dreamdom (夢由藝文工作室) — which he said was responsible for planning the protest — said that the move on the Legislative Yuan was a temporary measure meant to put pressure on the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus to convene an emergency session to force the withdrawal of the curriculum guidelines.
Back at the ministry gates, alliance members burned “ghost money” and pictures of Wu as a symbolic sacrifice to Lin’s spirit.
They then sang "Happy Birthday" while holding white roses, saying that they would “keep Lin company” outside the gates until midnight.
Thursday was Lin’s 20th birthday, and he said in a final Facebook post that the withdrawal of the guidelines was his only birthday wish.
Democratic Progressive Party caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) made an appearance next to the fire, promising to call on Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) to hold consultations on forcing Wu’s resignation and the withdrawal of the guidelines.
Shouts of “Wu, go to hell” and “curriculum guidelines go to hell” quickly erupted as activists threw “ghost money” into the air.
As news of the protest spread, the crowd outside ministry gates swelled, with activists demanding that Wu submit his resignation by 1am.
They pushed down the ministry’s barricades and occupied its outer courtyard after the deadline passed.
Student activists on Thursday had confronted Wu outside of Lin’s home, yelling for the “minister murderer” (殺人部長) to resign.
Alliance spokesman Brian Sung (宋運川) said the group had decided to initiate the protest after returning from a ministry-sponsored forum on the guidelines at National Wu-Ling Senior High School where disrespectful comments about Lin been made by a member of the pro-unification Patriot Association.
The protesters’ actions were fueled both by grief for Lin and by frustration over the ministry’s refusal to withdraw the guidelines and initiate meaningful dialogue, he said, while refusing to comment on the role of Dreamdom.
“[Ministry officials] turned our earnestness and hard work into a game,” Northern Taiwan Anti-Curriculum Changes Alliance spokesman Wang Pin-chen (王品蓁) said.
While students demanded that the curriculum guidelines be withdrawn, ministry officials in forums yesterday only promised that students who won a “lottery” would be able to talk with Wu, she said.
Activists had repeatedly demanded that Wu meet with all students publicly, rather than arranging a private meeting.
“While the ministry says that they sincerely want to communicate with us, they have absolutely no idea what our demands are,” said Chung Hsin-ting (鐘欣庭), a sophomore at The Affiliated Senior High School of National Taiwan Normal University.
She said the deputy director of the K-12 Education Administration had to consult his cellphone at the Wu-Ling forum when she asked him to repeat protesters’ demands.
At press time yesterday, a crowd of 700 outside the ministry building had swelled following a mid-day lull. An impromptu forum square had been established outside ministry doors, with activists delivering non-stop speeches.
Impromptu tents had been erected throughout the ministry’s courtyard, while banners and posters were plastered over the ministry building and the remaining barricades.

Thursday, July 30, 2015

Taiwan Group blames minister for death

Group blames minister for death

DESPERATION:Filmmaker Yang Ya-che cited three suicides since 2010, saying they indicate the repression of society and the government is taking a toll on the nation

By Hsu Sheng-lun  /  Staff reporters

Northern Taiwan Anti-Curriculum Changes Alliance convener Chu Chen talks to reporters in Taipei yesterday wearing a T-shirt that comments on the treatment of student protesters.

Photo: Hsu Sheng-lun, Taipei Times

Northern Taiwan Anti-Curriculum Changes Alliance convener Chu Chen (朱震) accused Minister of Education Wu Se-hwa (吳思華) of “dereliction of duty,” saying that the minister has made the students bear criminal liabilities and cost a student’s life “just to help the ministry clean up the mess it has made.”
Alliance spokesperson Dai Lin (林冠華) was found dead yesterday in an apparent suicide.
Chu said outside the New Taipei City Mortuary Parlor — where an autopsy was performed on Lin’s body — that in addition to criticism and opposition by the public, the alliance has faced pressure from the ministry.
However, the group would prevent any similar tragedies from happening as they continue fighting for their cause, he said.
Wearing a T-shirt with the message: “An injury to one is an injury to all,” Chu said the words reflected the attitude of the protesters, adding that he wore the shirt to express his rage.
Tainan Anti-Curriculum Adjustments Front convener Chao Chen-chen (趙振辰) said he could hardly believe it when he heard the news of Lin’s death, adding that the ministry’s adjustments had forced students to give up their studies and even lose their lives.
Taichung First Senior High School student Liao Chung-lun (廖崇倫), a former spokesperson of student club Apple Tree Commune, which fired the first shot over the ministry’s controversial curriculum guideline adjustments, blamed himself for Lin’s death.
“It seems that I am the one responsible for [Lin’s] death,” Liao said on Facebook. “Sorry. I should have not fired the first shot. I am sorry.”
Liao uploaded a black image as his Facebook profile picture to mourn Lin’s demise.
Messages of support flooded in, telling him not to blame himself for the death.
“It is not you who should be sorry,” one message said.
“It is those who do not believe they are wrong who are in the wrong,” another said.
There were also comments encouraging him to carry on.
“Only by living on can we defeat the government,” one said.
“Those who stay should continue fighting,” another said.
As of press time, at least 13 schools’ had changed the cover image on their Facebook page to a black image to commemorate Lin’s passing.
Documentary maker Kevin Lee (李惠仁), who last year won first prize at the Taipei Film Festival with his documentary A Secret That Can’t be Exposed 2: The State Apparatus (不能戳的秘密2:國家機器) and wore a T-shirt with an anti-curriculum-changes slogan on it to this year’s event, said he could not stop crying after hearing about Lin’s death and castigated those who attributed Lin’s apparent suicide to his medical history.
Lee said he was infuriated by remarks made by Lin Shu-kuei (林淑貴), principal of the school that Dai Lin attended, who reportedly said during a visit to the Lin family that Dai Lin had “long-term emotional problems.”
Lin Shu-kuei should be “ashamed for shirking her responsibility so conveniently,” Lee said.
Dai Lin was among protesters arrested on Thursday night last week after entering the ministry building to protest the controversial adjustments to high-school curriculum guidelines.
Lee said the students who were briefly arrested and face legal action are too young to feel any trauma from the events, adding that he and Academia Sinica assistant researcher Peng Jen-yu (彭仁郁) had plans to assist the students over such matters.
“I am terribly sad that we were not fast enough [to help],” Lee said.
TV show host Cheng Hung-yi (鄭弘儀), whose program Lin appeared on to explain the alliance and its ideals, praised Dai Lin’s eloquence, courage, and clear and logical mind.
Cheng said he broke down upon learning the news of Dai Lin’s death.
“It might have been controversial and mistaken for the students to storm the ministry building, but is arresting, taking legal action and handcuffing them what you call education? Why is the ministry insisting on suing them and at the same time asking schools not to take disciplinary actions against them?” Cheng asked on Facebook.
Cheng said the public must remember the values embodied by Dai Lin.
Filmmaker Yang Ya-che wrote on Facebook: “In 2010 a [73-year-old woman] in Dapu [Borough, 大埔, Miaoli] took her own life [during controversy over land expropriations]; in 2013 another Dapu resident, Chang Sen-wen (張森文), committed suicide; in 2015, anti-curriculum-changes advocate [Dai] Lin killed himself. They all had to do, directly or indirectly, with repression by the government or society. Those who are in power can destroy people’s homes with official might, while officials who violate the law can thoughtlessly take legal action against journalists and students. This is what Taiwan has become in recent years."
Additional reporting by Wang Chieh and Ting Wei-chieh

Angry Taiwanese students storm legislature

Angry students storm legislature

SUNFLOWER REPRISE:Following the death of activist Dai Lin, students protesting high-school curriculum changes late last night stormed into the legislative compound, resulting in a standoff with the police

By Abraham Gerber and Wang Kuan-jen  /  Staff reporters

Students supporting the movement against the education ministry’s opaque high-school curriculum changes charge onto the premises of the Legislative Yuan in Taipei last night by climbing over the wall and fences.

Photo: Fang Pin-chao, Taipei Times

Nearly 100 students protesting against high-school curriculum guideline changes who were gathered in front of the Ministry of Education suddenly charged onto the premises of Legislative Yuan nearby by climbing over the wall and fences at about 10pm yesterday.
Throwing “ghost money” in the air as they assembled at the front entrance inside the legislative compound, the students chanted: “The party state killers are great! [Minister of Education] Wu Se-hwa (吳思華) is a murderer! Convene an extra session now for legislators to abolish curriculum [changes] via vote!”
As of press time at midnight last night, the police, on alert at the nearby Ministry of Education building, had not made any moves concerning the students at the Legislative Yuan, resulting in an apparent standoff.
The students stated their intent to fulfill the birthday wishes of Dai Lin (林冠華), the student protester who had apparently committed suicide.
Earlier yesterday, angry student activists confronted Wu, accusing him of being a “murderer” and demanding his resignation after the minister emerged from the apartment complex housing the family of Lin (林冠華).
Lin had played a leading role in student protests against the education ministry’s controversial adjustments to high-school curriculum guidelines that critics say reflect a “China-centric” view.
Wu met Lin’s family members for half an hour before emerging to host a press conference with Lin Shu-kuei (林淑貴), the principal of New Taipei Municipal Juang Jing Vocational High School, which Lin had attended.
Following the press conference, activists again confronted Wu over the ministry’s refusal to drop the new guidelines — which are schedueld to take effect tomorrow — criticizing his handling of the controversy and demanding his resignation.
“I’ve been protesting against the guidelines for three months — why haven’t you come out? Why have I only seen you today?” Northern Taiwan Anti-Curriculum Changes Alliance spokesman Wang Pin-chen (王品蓁) asked, choking up with tears.
In response to student demands that the guidelines be dropped, Wu reiterated the ministry’s position that it would not interfere with school teachers’ choice of textbooks, with teachers free to choose older textbooks drafted before the implementation of the adjusted guidelines.
His remarks sparked cries of “lies” from the activists, who yelled for the “minister murderer” to “face the music” as he was hustled away by bodyguards.
Three men in plainclothes pushed a student to the ground, prompting other students to chase them to their car, demanding that they reveal their identity. The students then surrounded the car to stop the men from leaving, blockading the vehicle until police officers arrived and shoved them aside, allowing the car to leave.
In response to media queries, Wu said he was willing to take “full responsibility” for all of the controversy sparked by the curriculum guidelines.
When asked what “full responsibility” meant, he said he would make an “appropriate statement.”
He expressed “regret” at Dai Lin’s death, while ruling out withdrawing the new curriculum guidelines.
When asked whether the ministry would drop charges against the student activists who broke into the ministry building with Lin last week, he said that the ministry would show the “greatest possible legal goodwill.”
By evening a crowd of close to 100 had gathered outside of the ministry compound, lighting candles and placing posters on the surrounding razor wire barricades featuring a ghost-like picture of Wu, wishing the minister “sweet dreams.”
Independent music promoter-turned-activist organizer Yao Ken-hsiang (姚茛翔) said that Wu’s “cold-bloodedness” and “shamelessness” were “unassailable.” Given that Wu was totally “unfeeling” regarding Lin’s death, the most activists could do was wish him a “good night sleep” without running into Lin in his dreams, he said.
Separately yesterday, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said he felt profound grief upon learning that Lin was found dead, adding that the ministry should hold talks with students who oppose the curriculum changes.
There should be a balance between support for the freedom of speech and a society ruled by law in the exchange of ideas, Ma said.
Premier Mao Chi-kuo (毛治國) was quoted by Executive Yuan spokesperson Sun Lih-chyun (孫立群) as saying he was “extremely grief-stricken” after hearing about Lin’s death and immediately asked Wu to provide necessary assistance to the student’s family.
Mao said that young people who are still learning and growing need the support and assistance of their families, schools, the government and society on many aspects, including their daily and mental lives.
As the social atmosphere and public issues nowadays might be exerting great stress on young people, the family and the school should offer them strength and support and “not have them bear unnecessary pressure,” Sun quoted Mao as saying.
Additional reporting by Alison Hsiao and CNA

Taiwan Student protester commits suicide

Student protester commits suicide

DRASTIC CHANGES:Dai Lin was found dead in his room, sparking speculation whether it was related to the campaign against curriculum adjustments

By Abraham Gerber and Loa Iok-sin  /  Staff reporters

Dai Lin, a member of the Northern Taiwan Anti-Curriculum Changes Alliance, holds up a black umbrella at his home in New Taipei City in an undated photograph to represent the government’s opaque “black box” changes to the high-school curriculum guidelines.

Photo taken from Lin Kuan-hua’s Facebook account

A student who had campaigned against the Ministry of Education’s controversial adjustments to high-school curriculum guidelines was found dead yesterday in an apparent suicide at his family’s residence in New Taipei City.
Dai Lin (林冠華), a member of the Northern Taiwan Anti-Curriculum Changes Alliance, was found dead by emergency workers who were summoned by his mother after her son failed to respond to calls outside his bedroom, the New Taipei City Fire Department said. After police arrived and broke down the door, they saw Lin lying in bed with a pan of charcoal lighted on a nearby desk, in an apparent suicide.
Yesterday was his 20th birthday.
Lin was a second-year student at the continuing studies division of the New Taipei Municipal Juang Jing Vocational High School. He applied for a leave of absence last month so he could devote more time to the anti-curriculum changes campaign.
Lin had been a prominent activist within the Northern Taiwan Anti-Curriculum Changes Alliance. While alliance members refused requests to confirm his exact role, Lin periodically served as one of the group’s spokespeople, with alliance convener Chu Chen (朱震) and other members deferring to him throughout a press conference earlier this month at the Legislative Yuan.
He was among the students who were arrested on Thursday night last week for breaking into the ministry’s compound to protest changes to the curriculum guidelines. Protesters have urged the ministry to withdraw the changes — which are to take effect tomorrow — because of their “China-centric” focus and questionable approval process.
In a final Facebook post, Lin wrote: “Wish me happy birthday. 8 5 12 16. I have only one wish: Minister [of Education Wu Se-hwa (吳思華)] withdraw the curriculum guidelines.”
Lin’s friends later “decoded” the numbers 8-5-12-16 as corresponding to the letters for “h-e-l-p” in the English alphabet.
New Taipei City Department of Education Commissioner Lin Teng-chiao (林騰蛟) said that Dai Lin had suffered from long-term “emotional problems.”
His mother had stayed with him until 2am yesterday, while his school’s military instructor waited nearby, the commissioner said, adding that it was “unfortunate” that Dai Lin had chosen to end his life in the early morning while his family was sleeping.
Juang Jing Vocational High School principal Lin Shu-kuei (林淑貴) was quoted in the Chinese-language United Daily News as saying that Dai Lin had been emotionally unstable since the start of last semester and had received counseling from teachers.
His mother, according to the Chinese-language Apple Daily, said that Dai Lin had been “depressed” since being released on bail last week for entering the ministry building.
“I very much regret that I was not able to stop this,” she said in a statement, denying that her son had been pressured or threatened by ministry officials.
Separately yesterday, a tearful Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) made public screenshots of a conversation on the messaging app Line, which suggested that Dai Lin had planned his suicide as a way to stop the implementation of the curriculum guidelines.
In the conversation between Dai Lin and a friend on June 1, which Chen displayed at a political commentary show yesterday afternoon, Dai Lin told his friend he had an idea that could “very possibly stop the curriculum guideline adjustments,” adding that he would exercise his plan on July 30.
“When I do it, the media and the public opinion would go crazy about it,” Dai Lin said in the Line conversation.
When his friend asked what he planned to do, he replied: “I cannot say it, there are just some things that you can only do, but not say.”
“Don’t worry. What I am going to do will give you some force to stop the curriculum guideline adjustments,” he added.
The friend replied: “I know what you are going to do,” and “Please don’t die.”
“You think too much,” Dai Lin said.
“Mistakes committed by the government should not be shouldered by students,” Chen, in tears, said after showing the screenshots. “If the Ministry of Education was sincere about communicating with the students, why would this happen?”
Additional reporting by Weng Yu-huang

Tuesday, July 28, 2015

Taiwan's President must make curriculum views clear: Ko

President must make curriculum views clear: Ko

By Abraham Gerber and Shih Hsiu-chuan  /  Staff reporters

Taiwan Solidarity Union Legislator Chou Ni-an rings the doorbell at the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office yesterday, where she intended to press charges against Minister of Education Wu Se-hwa, among others, for infringements of freedom of expression and other offenses.

Photo: CNA

President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Premier Mao Chi-kuo (毛治國) should make public their stances on the controversial “fine-tuning” of high-school curriculum guidelines, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) said yesterday, criticizing what he called the Ma administration’s unwillingness to address the controversy.
“Because the curriculum guidelines have already caused so much controversy, the premier and the president should have made their stances clear long ago,” Ko said.
“The curriculum guidelines are their problem and it is their responsibility to resolve it,” Ko said. “Because the issue has not been properly addressed and the Ministry of Education did not deal with the student protests effectively, things got to the point where the police had to come in and clean up the mess.”
The adjustments to curriculum guidelines slated to go into effect on Aug. 1 have been controversial for an allegedly “China-centric” focus and “opaque” approval process.
Student activists and three reporters were arrested on Thursday for trespassing on ministry grounds during a protest against the changes.
Ko yesterday said that any decision on whether police officers would be disciplined for making the arrests would have to wait until the Taipei Police Department presented a full report.
Because of the police department’s vested interests, the report would be subject to a review by a city committee chaired by Taipei Deputy Mayor Teng Chia-chi (鄧家基), with the students and reporters involved invited to submit their views, he said.
Meanwhile, the ministry yesterday reiterated that it would continue to “cooperate” with the police investigation into the incident in accordance with the law.
Deputy Minister of Education Chen Der-hwa (陳德華) said that while the ministry would advise the public prosecutor to show leniency in cases where students were willing to apologize, there were no plans to drop charges.
He added that the students’ physical altercation with a ministry official who tried to prevent them from entering the building was subject to public prosecution.
Chen added that no decision had been made on whether or not to drop charges against the reporters who had been arrested with the students.
Separately yesterday, in a regular meeting at the Presidential Office building attended by Ma, Mao and Cabinet officials, Minister of Education Wu Se-hwa (吳思華) made a presentation on the planned adjustments to the curriculum guidelines, but made no mention of the ministry’s much-criticized handling of the protest.
Wu defended the procedures the ministry had followed in proposing the adjustments as he said that they were in accordance with established precedents.
The 17 debatable items in the new version of the curriculum guidelines were in line with historical facts and the Constitution, Wu added.
In response to demands that the decisionmaking process be made transparent, the ministry has publicized meeting minutes and the conclusions of the curriculum review committee, Wu said, adding that the ministry would stand by its decision not to disclose what each review committee member had said and voted for at the meetings.
Making the information public “could have serious repercussions for the operations of the administration branch” because it would mean that individuals sitting on many other committees commissioned by the ministry or other governmental agencies would also become subject to the requirement, Wu said.

Saturday, July 25, 2015

Taiwan Curriculum Protests: Arrests threaten press freedom: journalist

Curriculum Protests: Arrests threaten press freedom: journalist

SUNFLOWER PRECEDENT?Liao said that reporters were allowed in the legislature during the Sunflower movement, so they should have had the same permission for this story

By Huang Tun-yan, Tsai Ying and Chen Wei-han  /  Staff reporters, with staff writer

Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) photographer Liao Chen-huei, center, Coolloud Collective reporter Sung Hsiao-hai, left, and freelance journalist Lin Yu-yo walk out of an office at the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office after refusing to pay bail on Friday.

Photo: Chen Chih-chu, Taipei Times

The arrest of three journalists on Thursday for entering the Ministry of Education building to cover a protest over proposed adjustments to high-school curriculum guidelines could muzzle the freedom of the press, one of those arrested said yesterday.
Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’sister newspaper) photographer Liao Chen-huei (廖振輝), Coolloud Collective reporter Sung Hsiao-hai (宋小海) and freelance journalist Lin Yu-yo (林雨佑) were among 33 people detained by police for entering the building on Thursday night. The journalists were put under house arrest after each refused to post bail of NT$10,000 on Friday.
“I saw students breaking into [the ministry’s headquarters], and I instinctively thought that it might be a repetition of the Sunflower movement,” Liao said. “As a reporter, how could I not follow them to witness a historic moment?”
The Sunflower movement was a 23-day student-led protest during which protesters occupied the main legislative chamber last year. The protest was over what critics called the government’s opaque handling of a service trade agreement with China.
Liao said he was at the site to cover protests in front of the building on Thursday night, adding that he followed protesters who entered the building, photographing events as they unfolded, including the initial arrests.
An officer tried to persuade him and the other two journalists to keep away while officers were making the arrests, Liao said.
However, they were allowed to remain until an officer, seemingly the commander on the scene, told them that the police had to arrest and detain students and reporters alike because the ministry insisted on filing charges against all intruders, Liao said, adding that the three journalists were not allowed to access their cellphones or laptops.
The police confiscated Liao’s cellphone, and his request to call the Liberty Times office to say he was safe was denied by police, who told Liao that they had to ask a supervisor for permission.
Liao said he did not know whether the officers had relayed his request, adding that he was not allowed to make any calls during the first few hours of his detention.
Liao asked why they were being treated like criminals when reporters were allowed into the Legislative Yuan during the Sunflower protests.
Police violence against reporters could easily lead to a chilling conclusion, he said.
Asked if he would cover protesters breaking into restricted sites again, despite spending a day in custody and facing a legal battle, Liao said: “I would definitely follow [protesters] and go where they go.”
“We need more reporters [at such occurences] so the government does not dare abuse its power and infringe on the freedom of the press,” he said.
Sung said that after being arrested, the three journalists were kept in the ministry’s lobby, with SWAT officers standing guard.
“I asked an officer: If we are being arrested, could we contact lawyers? However, the officer said he had to ask his supervisor,” Sung said. “We waited for more than an hour before someone said that the ministry would be pressing charges. However, when we were transferred to police headquarters at about 2am, the police said they had to make sure the ministry really wanted to take legal action.”
Lin said that when he was taking pictures before being arrested, officers tried to prevent him from doing so by covering his camera and threatening to arrest him for obstructing officers of the law.
“If the police were acting according to the law, why were they so afraid of journalists and protesters recording everything? What is the legal basis for the police to stop journalists and protesters from taking pictures?” Lin said.
Additional reporting by Loa Iok-sin