Friday, August 16, 2019

Teachers Fighting for Public Schools Were Key to the Uprising in Puerto Rico

Teachers Fighting for Public Schools Were Key to the Uprising in Puerto Rico

Teachers laid the groundwork for the uprising with their battles against the dictatorial Fiscal Oversight and Management Board. They stopped charter schools and fought off a pension attack. Photo: Armando Diaz (CC BY NC-NO 2.0)
In the two months leading up to the uprising which ousted Puerto Rican Governor Ricardo Roselló, educators celebrated hard-fought victories against the privatization of their education system. Struggles by teachers and families against school closures and charter schools helped pave the way for July’s unprecedented outpouring of protest (see box).
By the end of the school year in June, it became clear that the struggle to stop charterization had largely won. There is only one actively functional charter school on the island.

Popular Uprising Topples Governor

Puerto Rico has seen repeated demonstrations of hundreds of thousands of people since July 13, when then-Governor Ricardo Rosseló’s ugly chats with his inner circle were revealed. The mass street protests toppled his government in just two weeks.
Demonstrators shut down a highway and called a general strike demanding the governor’s resignation.
Besides hatred for women, homophobia, and contempt for those killed by Hurricane Maria, the chats revealed the elite’s sharing of confidential government information with lobbyists.
And earlier that week, the island’s former Secretaries of Education and the Health Insurance Administration were arrested by the FBI on charges of corruption and fraud.
On July 24 Rosselló announced his resignation. Two more governors were successively sworn in within a week—the first forced out by the unconstitutionality of his appointment and more protests.
But the people’s anger was not just about the chats, the corruption, or the government’s incredibly inadequate response to Hurricane Maria.
The U.S. Congress in 2016 handed dictatorial powers in Puerto Rico to an unelected Fiscal Oversight and Management Board in the name of debt restructuring. This board has pushed massive cuts to public education and to the University of Puerto Rico, cuts to pensions, and a drive to privatize public services, including the electric utility.
One chant this summer went: “Ricky, renuncia! Y llévate la Junta!” (“Ricky, resign—and take the Board with you!”)
So the demand for the governors to resign came from unions, feminist groups, students, members of all political parties, businesspeople—even a police association. Everyone agrees that the outpouring of organizing and protest is not over yet.
—Jane Slaughter
Then in July, teachers and families who had fought pitched battles against the closing of 442 public schools by ex-Secretary of Education Julia Keleher were vindicated when Keleher was arrested on corruption charges.
As the new school year starts in August, educators are still fighting to fully fund and staff the schools, reopen those shuttered under Keleher, and keep the charters out. In the weeks and months to come, expect educators to keep playing a critical role in the struggle for democracy, against austerity, and for the dignity of the working class in Puerto Rico.

SAVING TEACHER PENSIONS

One of the least known but most critical struggles to keep an eye on in coming months is the fight to save educators’ pensions.
Public workers are under tremendous pressure to tighten their belts in order to ensure repayment of $74 billion in illegitimate debt that the government owes to bondholders.
The debt crisis was created by an economic slump that has lasted since 2006, causing the government to take out loans to operate. These loans were bought up by hedge-fund vultures whose goals are to make huge profits while forcing the government to cut back services to the working people of Puerto Rico.
But as Hurricane Maria and this summer’s uprising have revealed to the world, Puerto Rican workers simply can’t stand to suffer for the rich anymore.
In June, rank-and-file educators in Puerto Rico came together in an incredible movement of solidarity and self-organization to defeat a proposal that would have gutted the retirements of thousands of educators.
The last week of May, the Asociación de Maestros de Puerto Rico (AMPR), an affiliate of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), unveiled a sweetheart deal negotiated directly with the Fiscal Oversight and Management Board. This federally imposed board, known locally as la Junta, acts like a dictatorship as it oversees the process of making workers pay for Puerto Rico’s odious debt.
The AFT spent $3 million in a year-long, closed-door negotiation that went over the heads of the elected government and behind the backs of the teachers. Its proposal would have canceled the pensions of thousands of current educators and replaced them with 401(k) retirement plans, reduced the pensions of current retirees by 8.5 percent, and raised the retirement age from 55 to 63. The deal also eliminated Christmas bonuses and would have required teachers to work on nationally recognized holidays.
But the Federación de Maestros de Puerto Rico (FMPR), a rival teachers union with a long history of class struggle, along with allies in the fight to save public education, waged a successful Vote No campaign that rejected the deal and unexpectedly stopped the Junta and the AMPR/AFT in their tracks.
The Vote No campaign was an uphill battle. AMPR/AFT spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on deceitful TV and radio campaign ads, portraying the agreement as a necessary compromise which would preserve pensions. Instead of putting polling places in schools or any other public space, the union rented private venues so it could allow its staff and their literature inside and keep out the opposition. AMPR/AFT even called the police in order to prevent neutral observers from entering the polling stations.
Despite these repressive measures, the FMPR mobilized crews to have a presence outside 96 percent of the polling places. With exit polls in hand, the Vote No campaigners helped ensure that the vote was proper and that the election couldn’t be stolen.

POSSIBLE ISN’T ENOUGH

This has been a glorious summer, where hundreds of thousands of Puerto Ricans participated in the biggest general strike ever on the island. The strikes and demonstrations that brought down the Roselló regime were largely spontaneous and broadly democratic, but the seeds of the insurrection were planted by decades of struggle.
These struggles have been led by feminists who fought against gender violence and homophobia, muckraking journalists who uncovered the depths of government corruption, activists organizing for the debt to be dropped, community members building autonomous centers of self-organization, environmentalists who stopped a pipeline, students who went on strike to keep their universities public, artists who preserved and created culture, and unionists who refused to compromise away working people’s futures.
No one party, organization, or union called for the strike and demonstrations. Many groups contributed to their outbreak and political character.
If we can learn something from this victorious moment, it is that the road ahead lies in fighting back for the future and refusing to compromise.
In the labor movement, unions like the AMPR in Puerto Rico and the AFT in the U.S. have negotiated away our rights over and over, under the cover of accomplishing the possible and avoiding the greater evil. This approach allows our opponents to chip away little by little, until we find our public education in shambles, neighborhood schools closed, students’ lives turned upside down, and educators’ future sold out.
Our future depends on fighting for the “impossible,” against the whole logic of a system that will have workers pay with their lives.

WIND IN OUR SAILS

Today the fighters for the future of education in Puerto Rico have huge victories under our belts and the wind in our sails. We have brought down two corrupt governors and are working on our third. The protests, rallies, marches, art performances, and battles on the streets against police brutality complemented each other. It was a triumph for the Puerto Rican people.
While the government continues to flail in crisis, the people are organizing regional assemblies that are spreading and growing. We hope to see a new wave of demands emerge from these assemblies.
The FMPR will call for auditing the debt, reopening our schools, reversing anti-worker laws, revoking the privatization of public agencies, adding an anti-sexist curriculum in schools, and building the quality public education system that the people of Puerto Rico deserve.
The popular insurrection in Puerto Rico has proven once again that “when we fight, we can win.”
Mercedes Martinez is president of the FMPR. Monique Dols is an early childhood educator based in New York City.
A version of this article appeared in Labor Notes #486, September 2019. Don't miss an issue, subscribe today.

Monday, August 12, 2019

The Last ESL Picture Show

On August 7, 2019, I returned to Chungder Middle School in Hu-Wei, Yun-Lin County for a one shot summer enrichment class. I had three forty-five minute periods with one group of twenty fourteen-year-olds. I would do my "Design a Park" lesson, one I have done with a number of groups I was asked to address by the Kang Xian Publisher that sponsors me. 
      The lesson consists of three parts: The first period is an ice-breaker. I talk with the students and introduce the concept of "reported speech", the way people tell each other what they have heard said  while they were away. The rules in English are specific and quite different from Chinese reported speech. The introduction culminates in a board contest revision practicing the new skill. One student in each group writes the reported speech response.
      By the end of the period, I have segued into the topic of the day: City Parks. We talk about whether or not we like parks and what we do when we are in one. The second period begins with a handout called "Improve This Park". The board contest continues with questions about the drawing of a derelict park. We brainstorm ways to improve the park; rules they would make and fixtures they would add. If they could design a park what would they want to include in there. I tell the students they will have the opportunity to design their "Perfect Park Plan" on a poster, and then describe their park to the group. I ask them to consider the size and location of the park before we take a break. That information will be critical in an introduction they will give. 
     In the third period, the groups of four-students are given one poster and a set of markers. Each member of the group has a quarter of the poster to design and describe in a report show and tell. They have fun sketching and coloring in the park with items we had brainstormed. The conversation in the group is inevitably in Chinese; middle school students are more interested in socializing than practicing English language skills. It does not matter that they are to give a report in English when they are done drawing. They are having so much fun! That is the problem; they cannot finish drawing! They neglect to prepare what they are going to say in the report. Despite my circulating around the room asking questions, keeping them on task, and reminding them they must describe relative directions of features ("The bathrooms are near the entrance between the basketball courts and playground") a unified report never coagulated.  
 The "Design a Park" lesson plan went well up to the last thirty minutes. It was time to go to the front of the room, put the poster on the board, and describe the park, but the students had not prepared; they had taken no notes and were at a loss to report in English. I was surprised. They had shown capabilities to do so in the reported speech and brainstorming segments of the lesson, but they had not paidattention to the introduction I had modeled. When I called their group to the front to speak, it was a disaster. They were lucky if one student in the group could articulate more than one sentence. I knew they were capable of giving a report if they had more time to prepare. I suggested to their home teacher that he pursue the project, but it is up to him.

This was not the first time I had run into this problem with this lesson. I decided there and then: I would not have students draw their own park plans again. That motivation was not working to encourage language development.Instead of drawing parks, I will hand out photos of park plans; there are many to choose from on the internet. We will brainstorm in the same way and go over new vocabulary, prepositions of place, and cardinal directions. In this way, the students will spend their time discussing the park, identifying the features, and writing a unified report.
      As in "Design the Park", each student is responsible for describing a section of the park. It might not be as much fun as drawing a poster and socializing with one's classmates in Chinese, but it will focus on the English to be practiced.                                  Perhaps I will show the plan on the screen through an internet connection and the students can point out the details to the class in their reports. There is something about how to show films in class, too, for maximum ESL practice, done with periodic follow-up writing or discussion. Many teachers and students look to audio-visuals as a break from studying instead of using it as a learning resource, but this was my last ESL picture show.  
Copyright © 2019 by David Barry Temple. All rights reserved.

Saturday, August 10, 2019

Readers Theater Rush of Rehearsals

     On September 26, 2018, I began Readers Theater previews for the impending contest. I met a first-time troupe at Feng-Nan Middle School in Feng-yuan, then three more previews up to the contest at the end of October. Only one troupe, Guang-Zhen M.S., had me hear them before the summer break and updated in July. I went back to see them again  for a final rehearsal, and for more than the one hour each of the other three schools gave me. 

Feng-Nan Middle School (Sept. 25)
     Feng-Nan's "Little Red Hen" script and troupe and two others come to me new; only one of three schools sent me a script to preview, and only a few weeks ago, too late to make any major corrections. Feng-Nan's  troupe still hadn't memorized their lines as I modified some. The children's intonation and some pronunciation was off. They had no inflection in their voices or body language; they didn't get the gist of the twist in the plot that the Red Hen was angry her animal friends wanted bread after neglecting to help.  Generously, she gave in after scolding them. 



Chung-Lun Middle School (Oct. 2)
     Another Readers Theater was previewed on October 2. We were ready to leave at twelve o'clock relaxing a moment before the publishing agent in a van picked us up to bring us there. 




Han-Kou Middle School (Oct. 5)



Li-Ming Middle School (Oct. 9)






They save the best for last, and on October 11, I returned to Sunny's school, Guang-Zhen in Dali for the third and final time before the contest in which they won second place.






Copyright © 2019 by David Barry Temple. All rights reserved.

Dong Nan Girls' School Paradise in Yun-Lin


       On Jan. 14, 2019 we were down in Yunlin in the  morning at an all-girls middle school, an oasis if you will, a former private school, still with dormitories. I was wondering why students were there on Sunday. I spent about two hours with each of two classes, starting an introduction to reported speech and revision and ending with a reading from chapter three of Year of the Boar & Jackie Robinson about Shirley Temple Wong's first day in an American school. The girls, in teams, brainstormed a chronological  order summarizing, collectively, and sharing details on the board.  The Taiwanese home teachers had never seen such pedagogy before. It didn't dawn on her that through revision and correction, grammar was being addressed and absorbed









Copyright © 2019 by David Barry Temple. All rights reserved.