Thursday, February 4, 2016

MOE stymies curriculum review board

MOE stymies curriculum review board

BLANKS:‘Omissions and circles are everywhere in the minutes,’ one activist said, referring to the redaction of some committee members’ names from meeting records

By Abraham Gerber  /  Staff Reporter

Action Coalition of Civics Teachers spokesman Huang I-chung, second right, and some other teachers and activists yesterday hold a press conference in Taipei, demanding that the Ministry of Education withdraw its adjustments to high-school curriculum guidelines.

Photo: Lo Pei-der, Taipei Times

Consideration of new high-school curriculum guidelines ground to a halt yesterday, after the Ministry of Education announced that it is to disband the current curriculum review committee pending the May 20 government changeover.
The review committee would only undertake a review of the conclusion of a history experts’ consultation committee and present a report to the National Academy for Educational Research for its consideration on social studies guidelines, Deputy Minister of Education Lin Teng-chiao (林騰蛟) said.
The ministry had originally intended to publicly announce new sets of curriculum guidelines between this month and May, he said.
The ministry would revise directives governing the review committee to make it reorganize ahead of schedule in June, after Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) president-elect Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration assumes office, requiring new committee members to agree to the publication of their names.
Names of current members would not be publicized without their consent, he said, adding that there was no need to withdraw controversial “adjusted” high-school social studies curriculum guidelines, because the ministry had already allowed for schools to continue to use unaltered textbooks.
The ministry’s decision came following pressure from DPP legislators, who earlier in the day held a news conference with students’ rights advocates to demand that the adjusted guidelines be withdrawn and consideration of new guidelines stopped.
The adjusted guidelines sparked controversy with what critics described as the opaque “black box” method of their approval and an allegedly “China-centric” bias, sparking a student movement last year that occupied the ministry’s courtyard and leading to calls that consideration of new guidelines be halted pending institutional reforms.
DPP Legislator Cheng Li-chun (鄭麗君) yesterday morning accused the ministry of seeking to present Tsai’s future administration with a fait accompli by forcing through new guidelines before it hands over power.
Cheng said that her motion to require the ministry to delay considerations on the new guidelines until a comprehensive review of the approval process was conducted had already been signed by 64 legislators — enough to gain passage when the new session opens on Feb. 19.
“The current administration is a caretaker administration and should respect public opinion instead of muddling through with its opaque ‘black box’ approval processes,” DPP Legislator Yu Mei-nu (尤美女) said.
Civic activists called for the full publication of the meeting records of the curriculum review committee.
“Omissions and circles are everywhere in the minutes,” said Anti-Black Box Curriculum Guidelines Action Alliance spokesman Huang Yi-chung (黃益中), referring to the “circles” used in place of Chinese characters for the names of committee members who chose to remain anonymous.
Knowing committee members’ names is important for activists to be able to hold officials accountable for their remarks, as well as to verify their qualifications, National High School Teachers’ Union deputy secretary-general Huang Hui-chen (黃惠貞) said.
Incomplete meeting records also made it impossible for activists to verify how important decisions were made, she said, citing a controversial decision to increase the proportion of Mandarin language classes and make the study of selections from the Four Books of Confucian canon mandatory.
Activists also called for review committee budget details to be published.
Additional reporting by Rachel Lin

Wednesday, January 13, 2016

Taiwan ruler Ma Ying-jeou passed Harvard Law School despite thesis with 1000+ errors



Taiwan ruler Ma Ying-jeou passed Harvard Law School despite thesis with 1000+ errors

  


Ma Ying-jeou   Prince Roy photo 
Republic of China in-exile President Ma Ying-jeou's official biography declares, "Ma received a Doctor of Juridical Science (S.J.D.) from HarvardLaw School in 1981, specializing in law of the sea and international economic law."
Ma's doctoral thesis was titled,Trouble Over Oily Waters: Legal Problems of Seabed Boundaries and Foreign Investments in the East China Sea. The paper was good enough to get him a law degree from America's richest university but does not speak well of scholarship standards at Harvard Law School.
Ma's thesis is filled with errors, mistakes, misspellings, misattribution, missing words and grammatical problems. The thesis contains over 1,000 errors that violate Harvard's writing guidebook for incoming freshmen students
A retired schoolteacher looked up Ma's thesis because she was interested in his views on the Senkaku Islands. The former teacher was shocked by the sloppy scholarship and got out her red pencil. She spent a year studying the thesis, checking out all the footnotes.
The teacher has not yet found plagiarism but with misattributed material and footnotes that do not check out she is suspicious and continues digging into the academic paper.
Like any good teacher, the tireless researcher took her concerns to Harvard where she was directed to Ma's faculty advisor, Detlev Vagts. Professor Vagts is retired and conveniently didn't keep a copy of the thesis he approved.
In 2008, Vagts told the Harvard Crimson about Ma's thesis, "I thought it was very good, very solid and very sensible both legally and politically." Vagts told the Crimson he had been approached by a reporter in Taiwan about "all the typos" but apparently confused the retired teacher with being a reporter.
Vagts said, "Typos really don't matter that much when you are picking a president." However, Ma was not being picked as a president when he submitted his error-filled thesis for academic credit in 1980.
The English-as-second-language excuse does not cover the thesis mistakes, especially since Ma served as translator for Chiang Ching-kuo during his rule of Taiwan. Many of the errors are stylistic and simply betray sloppy work.
The school teacher asked Vagts to directly comment on Ma's errors. The professor responded in writing betraying his own lack of care with typos. "Although I would like to be helpful with Ma Ying Jeou's thesis m ability to do so is limited.It was not then the rule that we kept a copy of doctoral theses for our library and I do not have one in my possession."
Vagts assured the teacher he had "high standards for approval" and he was "fully satisfied that Ma Ying Jeou met those standards."

Wednesday, December 16, 2015

Book Review: Peter McLaren: Putting Radical Life in Schools

Peter McLaren: Putting Radical Life in Schools

Sunday, 25 January 2015 00:00By Paul Street, Truthout | Book Review
Peter McLaren, Life in Schools: An Introduction to Critical Pedagogy and the Foundations of Education, 6th Edition (Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, 2014)
"School reform" has a very bad reputation among left thinkers and activists for some very good reasons in the neoliberal era. Captive to corporate-backed school privatization activists, contemporary "school reform" sets public schools, teachers, and teacher unions up to fail by blaming them for low student standardized test scores that are all-too unmentionably the product of students' low socioeconomic status and related racial and ethnic oppression. Its obsession with test scores assaults imagination and critical thinking, narrowing curriculum and classroom experience around the lifeless task of filling in the correct bubbles beneath droves of authoritarian multiple-"choice" questions crafted in distant, sociopathic corporate cubicles. Students become passive recipients of strictly limited information deposited into their brains by teachers who "are prevented from taking risks and designing their own lessons as the pressure to produce high test scores produces highly scripted and regimented" pedagogy, wherein "worksheets become a substitute for critical teaching and rote memorization takes the place of in-depth thinking" (Henry Giroux). Pupils are rendered incapable of morally and politically challenging – and envisaging alternatives to – the terrible conditions they face under contemporary state capitalism and related oppression structures outside and inside schools.
Much if not most of what passes for school reform is really about public school destruction, corporate takeover, slashing teachers' salaries and benefits, and undermining students and citizens' ability to question a system that has been concentrating ever more wealth and power into elite hands for more than a generation. It is deeply (and by no means just coincidentally) consistent with the late comedian George Carlin's 2005 rant about what "the big wealthy business interests that control everything…don't want. They don't want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking." As Carlin elaborated:
"They don't want well-informed, well-educated people…who are smart enough to, figure out how badly they're getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago. You know what they want? Obedient workers people who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork but just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly shittier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, reduced benefits, the end of overtime and the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it."
But what if "school reform" meant the empowerment of radically democratic educators who sought the opposite what Carlin's business owners want – and more? What if those teachers were dedicated to helping future citizens and workers become sufficiently smart, inspired, confident, courageous, loving and solidaristic, not only to understand what the capitalist owners and their coordinators are doing to society and life itself, but also to resist those elites and to create an egalitarian, democratic, sustainable, peaceful, and truly human world turned upside down? Such teachers wouldn't think that schools could bring about such a revolutionary transformation on their own. They would, however, understand "how," in the leading left educational and social critic Peter McLaren's words, "schools are implicated in social reproduction…how schools perpetuate or reproduce the social relationships and attitudes needed to sustain the existing dominant economic and class relations of the larger society." Determined to interrupt and overturn that deadly reproduction, they would grasp the "partial autonomy of the school culture" and the necessity of occupying that space as "a vehicle for political activism and creating a praxis of social equality, economic justice, and gender equality" (Life in Schools, 150).
That is the goal behind McLaren's classic text Life in Schools: An Introduction to Critical Pedagogy and the Foundations of Education, recently updated for the Obama era in a sixth edition. "We are living," McLaren writes near the end of Life in Schools:
"…in what Antonio Gramsci called a war of position – a struggle to unify diverse social movements in our collective efforts to resist global capitalism – in order to wage what he called a war of maneuver (a concerted effort to challenge and transform the state, to create an alternative matrix for society other than value). Part of our war of position is taking place in our schools. Schools form part of Gramsci's integral state as a government-coercive apparatus and an apparatus of political and cultural hegemony that continually needs to be renewed in order to secure the assent of the dominant group's agenda." (Life in Schools, 245-46).
Life in Schools is (among other things) a sprawling, many-sided, and brilliant manual of theory, history, and practice for teachers, teachers-in-training, and current and future education professors ready to enlist in that "war of position." The stakes, McLaren reminds us (like his colleague and ally Giroux [1]), are not small:
"Today, amidst the most powerful conglomeration of cultural, political, and economic power aver assembled in history…we have seen our humanity swept away like a child's sigh in a tornado…The marble pillars of democracy have crashed around our heads, leaving us ensepulchered in a graveyard of empty dreams… The omnicidal regimes of our Anthropocene Era have brutalized our planet to the point of bringing ecosystems and the energies of evolution and speciation to the point of devastation and Homo Sapiens to the brink of extinction….Time is running out quickly. We are being chased to by the hounds of both heaven and hell 'with all deliberate speed' and we are being continually outflanked." (xxi, 259, 261)
Building on stories from his early years as what he considers a rather naïve liberal teacher in an inner-city Toronto school, McLaren takes his readers on a long and loving trip from his years in the classroom (Life in Schools contains a previously published journal [titled Cries From the Corridor] in which McLaren recorded his teaching experience prior to his engagement with radical theory) through the theory of revolutionary critical pedagogy; the roles that mainstream schools and educational doctrine play in subjugating working class and minority students; the structures and ideologies of contemporary oppression and inequality (class, race, gender, ethnicity, and empire); and methods for teachers to instill students with confidence, hope and capacity for resistance and solidarity.
Peter McLaren. (Photo: Challenge)Peter McLaren. (Photo: Challenge)Like the leading critical education theorists Henry Giroux and Paulo Freire, McLaren argues that educators have a duty to – in Freire's words – "engage in politics when we educate." The dominant methods and paradigms of North American education are richly political and ideological beneath their (false) claims of value-free objectivity and balance. Whereas those methods and paradigms covertly advance the predatory capitalist (neoliberal) project beneath the pretense of impartial neutrality (so that "being educated today constitutes a form of historically conditioned estrangement and alienation" [280]), critical pedagogy openly advances a liberating and participatory democratic socialism beyond both state capitalism and authoritarian socialism.
McLaren does not pretend that schools alone can rescue and re-energize democracy and justice in the United States. Still, he argues that schools can and must become zones of popular de-indoctrination, democratic re-imagination, and resistance to capital, whose giant transnational corporations are "taking hacksaws to the web of planetary ecosystems" and to "the covenant that once defined (however tenuously) the social commons." The task is essential in an era of escalating empire, inequality, and authoritarianism, when millions are forced into long-term "structural unemployment," prison, poverty, hopelessness and depression. The "rich are getting drunk on the tears of the poor" (233) while an "antiwar" US president kills Muslim civilians and even assassinates US citizens with arrogant impunity, and the Superpower shamelessly liquidates long-cherished civil liberties.
While Life in Schools seems directed primarily at academic departments of education, it deserves an audience far beyond the ivory tower. It is loaded with deeply informed radical perspectives that should interest progressive thinkers and activists in all spheres of life under contemporary capitalism. Especially relevant in light of recent events is McLaren's critique of academic theories that "'race,' not class is the major form of oppression in society." A dedicated anti-racist and anti-sexist, McLaren nonetheless reminds us that:
"Class exploitation…[is] the material armature material basis or material conditions of possibility for other forms of oppression within capitalist society… class exploitation is not simply one form of oppression among others; rather, it constitutes the ground on which other 'isms' of oppression are sustained within capitalist societies. When we claim that class antagonism….is [just] one in a series of social antagonisms – race, class, gender, and so on – we often forget the fact that class sustains the conditions that produce and reproduce the other antagonisms,…[whose] material basis can be traced to the means and relations of production within capitalist society – to the social division of labor that occurs when workers sell their labor power for a wage to the capitalist (Life in Schools, 217-18) ….Class as a social relation sets the conditions of possibility for many other social antagonisms, such as racism and sexism, thought it cannot be reduced to them" (125).
McLaren also offers trenchant insights on the reactionary role of the Obama administration. As portrayed (accurately by my estimation) in Life in Schools, the current US president is an abject "war criminal"(6-7, 274), a deadly enemy of civil liberties (232), a toady to Wall Street (6-7), a stealth agent of neoliberal so-called post-racial white supremacy (193-94), and a stalwart instrument of the corporate-neoliberal educational agenda, with its deadly testing obsession (16).
Equally instructive are McLaren's reflections on how much of what passes for resistance today is actually an expression of capitalist hegemony, and on the central role of corporate-manufactured hopelessness in the ruling class's intensifying destruction of justice, democracy, and life itself. "We have accommodated ourselves to the [contemporary state-capitalist and imperial] Deep State, and have routinized and ritualized our responses to it," McLaren's writes (xxi). The major barrier to the radical and democratic changes required, McLaren feels, has to do with hope and confidence: "The biggest prohibitive obstacle to organizing the Left is [a lack of] confidence that an alternative to capitalism can be made viable."
As McLaren acknowledges, it's not easy to answer the question of how to develop a widespread faith in socialism's viability. "But," he adds, "it's not easy to live in the world as presently fashioned, either, so we'd best get to work on finding some solutions" (257). Wise words.
---
1. Giroux's latest book begins with the observation that "America is descending into madness. The stories it now tells are filled with cruelty, deceit, lies, and legitimate all manner of corruption and mayhem. The mainstream media spin stories that are largely racist, violent, and irresponsible – stories that celebrate power and demonize victims…under the glossy veneer of entertainment…A predatory culture celebrates a narcissistic hyper-individualism that radiates a near-sociopathic lack of interest in – or compassion and responsibility for – others. Anti-public intellectuals …urge us to spend more, indulge more, and make a virtue out of personal gain, while producing a depoliticized culture of consumerism. Undermining life-affirming social solidarities and any viable notion of the public good, politicians trade in forms of idiocy and superstition that seem to mesmerize the undereducated and render the thoughtful cynical and disengaged. Militarized police forces armed with the latest weapons tested in Afghanistan and Iraq play out their fantasies on the home front…[while] defense contractors…market military-grade surveillance tools and weapons to a full range of clients, from gated communities to privately owned for-profit prisons." Henry Giroux, The Violence of Organized Forgetting: Thinking Beyond America's Disimagination Machine (San Francisco: City Lights, 2014), 9-10.