China to restrict textbooks promoting ‘Western values’

(Ed. Note: The source of this article, The New York Times, is the chief U.S. government propaganda tool and this article should be understood in that vein.)

China to restrict textbooks promoting ‘Western values’

NY Times News Service

Sun, Feb 01, 2015 - Page 4

In law school at Peking University in the late 1970s, Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (李克強) was an avid student of English and helped translate texts that gave his generation its first, exhilarating exposure to Western legal ideals after the death of Mao Zedong (毛澤東).

However, today Li’s work might be considered dabbling in subversion.

This week, China’s ideological drive against Western liberal ideas broadened to take in a new target: foreign textbooks.

Meeting in Beijing with the leaders of several prominent universities, Chinese Minister of Education Yuan Guiren (袁貴仁) laid out new rules restricting the use of Western textbooks and banning those sowing “Western values.”

“Strengthen management of the use of original Western teaching materials,” Yuan told the university officials, according to state news agency Xinhua. “By no means allow teaching materials that disseminate Western values in our classrooms.”

The strictures on textbooks are the latest measures to strengthen the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) control of intellectual life and eradicate avenues for spreading ideas about liberal democracy and civil society that it regards as dangerous to its hold on power.

On Jan. 19, the leadership issued guidelines demanding that universities make a priority of ideological loyalty to the party, Marxism and the ideas of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).

Yuan’s message this week explained how universities should do that.

“Never allow statements that attack and slander party leaders and malign socialism to be heard in classrooms,” he said, according to the Xinhua report. “Never allow teachers to grumble and vent in the classroom, passing on their unhealthy emotions to students.”

The CCP has repeatedly sought to reinforce ideological influence over education, especially since 1989, when then-Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) used armed soldiers to suppress pro-democracy student protests centered in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square.

However, many liberal intellectuals said Xi has elevated fear of Western subversion to a new extreme, and the scrutiny of textbooks reflects that fear.

“Higher education has been designated as a major battleground of ideological struggle,” said Zhang Xuezhong (張雪忠), a lawyer in Shanghai who was banned from teaching in 2013 because he was deemed to be spreading dangerous ideas, in a telephone interview.

“This won’t be the final step; there’ll be more to come,” Zhang added.

However, he said Chinese society was so diverse and exposed to outside information, even with censorship, that enforcing Marxist purity was nearly impossible.

“As for the effectiveness, and whether every university and college will enforce the demands as required, that’s a totally different matter,” Zhang said.

Just how the ministry’s demands regarding foreign textbooks will play out remains unclear.

In many Chinese universities, English-language textbooks and translations of them have become widely used in the natural sciences, economics, law, journalism and the social sciences.

Many students aspiring to study or work abroad believe mastering foreign works is essential to their success.

The publishing house of Tsinghua University in Beijing has reprinted a series of journalism textbooks in their original English, including News Reporting and Writing by Melvin Mencher.

The publishing houses of Peking University and Renmin University, also in Beijing, have printed a series of foreign textbooks for the humanities, business and law.

“We use foreign textbooks, but when the teacher is lecturing, they’ll add a Chinese spin,” Peking University economics professor Zhou Jianbo (周建波) said in an interview.

“If you want to change this, it’ll take a huge amount of effort,” he said. “Much of that literature is from abroad — about foreign problems and how foreigners approach them, because the work from abroad is still ahead of us.”

While the party is unlikely to entirely ban such books, its determination to cleanse schools of politically troublesome ideas seems unstoppable.

At the same meeting at which Yuan laid down his demands, university officials lined up to endorse the ideological clampdown.

“Propaganda and ideological work in higher education must make instruction in ideals and convictions its primary task,” Peking University CCP secretary Zhu Shanlu (朱善璐) said at the meeting, according to China Education News, a government Web site.

Paradoxically, this intellectual offensive is being brought by a generation of party leaders who came to adulthood during the traumatic years of the Chinese Cultural Revolution and in the first burst of liberalizing intellectual and political ferment that followed.

As a law student, Li, the premier, translated The Due Process of Law, by Alfred Denning, an influential English judge.

Li also helped compile Western legal materials used in the Peking University law school when it became permissible to study such ideas.

“In legal studies, in fact, the mainstream of thinking emerges from Western theories and traditions,” He Weifang (賀衛方), a law professor at Peking University whose liberal views have made him a target of hardline criticism, said in telephone interview. “We should convene a conference to study how Premier Li Keqiang disseminated Western legal theories.”

How The Language Police are Perverting Liberalism

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/01/not-a-very-pc-thing-to-say.html

Professional Portfolio - O.R. 3-30-98 "How can we describe stamps?"

Education Emancipation Organization blog presents the David Barry Temple Professional Portfolio. In these posts you shall find my collection of observation reports, letters, newspaper articles, photographs and other documents spanning my career as a teacher of English as a Second Language, from 1979 up to the present for your pleasure and information.

Preschool teachers protest outside education ministry

DIRTY DEALINGS:：Renoir Creative School founder Su Wei-hsin blasted government officials for holding what she described as secret discussions with select groups

By Lii Wen  /  Staff reporter

Thu, Jan 22, 2015 - Page 3

Nearly 100 preschool teachers yesterday rallied outside the Ministry of Education in Taipei saying the ministry’s reforms on childcare policy of being “hijacked by a select number of interest groups.”

The rally came amid a heated debate involving preschool teachers, childcare workers and private childcare facilities over a proposed amendment to the Early Childhood Education and Care Act (幼兒教育及照顧法).

The protesters urged the ministry to stand firmly behind its proposal to stipulate at least one certified preschool teacher for classes of children aged between five and six years old.

The ministry recently agreed to lengthen the “buffer period” for preschools to fulfill the requirement from five years to eight years, fueling speculation that the requirement might be terminated altogether under pressure from private for-profit preschools.

The preschool teachers said that private preschools are lobbying to abolish the requirement to reduce their personnel costs, as the salaries for certified preschool teachers are higher than childcare workers.

With bright red banners tied across their foreheads, the preprotesters marched and chanted slogans in front of the ministry as a meeting between the ministry and four representatives from preschool associations was held inside.

At a news conference earlier, preschool teachers’ representatives said that the ministry should respect their professional credentials.

Renoir Creative School founder Su Wei-hsin (蘇偉馨) blasted the ministry for engaging in what she described as secret discussions with select preschool associations and of ignoring the voices of other stakeholders.

She said that while childcare workers might have years of experience in taking care of children, many lack professional expertise.

“If experience were that important, then any grandmother could get a job at a preschool,” Su said. “Sometimes experience obstructs progress.”

Chang Yu-liang (張宇梁), a professor of education administration at National Chiayi University, told the news conference that he supports the establishment of certification measures for childcare workers as well, as it would serve to raise their wages.

In response, section chief on early education Wang Hui-chiu (王慧秋) said that the ministry would hold meetings involving more nationwide organizations next month.

On Monday, opposing rallies led by childcare workers and preschool teachers clashed outside the legislature as they backed differing views on the amendment.

Inside a Chinese Test-Prep Factory

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/04/magazine/inside-a-chinese-test-prep-factory.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=photo-spot-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=1

S. Krashen: The common core: Not a "promising opportunity" but a tsunami about to wreck American Education

SKrashen: The common core: Not a "promsing opportunity" but a tsumani about to wreck American...

SKRASHEN.BLOGSPOT.COM|BY SKRASHEN